- Dropbox for mac 10.5.8 for mac os x#
- Dropbox for mac 10.5.8 for mac os#
- Dropbox for mac 10.5.8 mac os#
I am curious as to which Open Source and Third-Party components are causing Dropbox to drop legacy PPC support and functionality for Dropbox Desktop Client. This isn't a "no it'll never happen." But we're currently working hard delivering other, equally exciting features." WebDAV, email attachments, and FTP access is not on the current feature roadmap, and likely won't be for the foreseeable future. "Do you offer WebDAV, Email Attachments, or FTP support? Here is a note from Dropbox's Help Center: Regarding someone's question as to whether there is an FTP method for accessing Dropbox, the answer is currently "no".
Dropbox for mac 10.5.8 mac os#
Makes me dizzy thinking about a custom-programmed application to provide my studio with continuing desktop synchronization in Mac OS 10.5.8. Mac users interested in Dropbox install os x 10.5.8 generally download: Dropbox 104.4 Free.
Dropbox for mac 10.5.8 for mac os#
No more SDK support from Dropbox for Mac OS 10.5 and older. With Dropbox on Mac, you can scan documents and convert receipts, documents, whiteboards, and notes into a PDF format. Note: The SDK is designed to work with OSX versions 10.7 and above." "Getting Started Using the DropboxSDK for OSX:Ģ.
Dropbox for mac 10.5.8 for mac os x#
The ReadMe for Mac OS X SDK 1.3.13 (software development kit) says this: I read that Synology's CloudSync uses Python and the Dropbox REST API which allow it to interact with Dropbox, in a similar way that the Dropbox client does for Windows, Linux and OSX. Now do I have to live in fear that Dropbox will decommission syncing within CloudSync? The DiskStation Manager (DSM) web-based operating system, based on the Linux Kernel, runs on an INTEL Atom D2700 processor. I have Dropbox syncing nicely on my new Synology DS 1513+ NAS using Synology CloudSync 1.0. Being backwardly compatible and cross platform should be an ideal, not a burden.įor Dropbox to decommission Dropbox Desktop Client for Mac OS X 10.5.8 messes up my workflow and backup strategy. A portion of Dropbox's income should go toward continuing support of legacy hardware and software. We still use AFP and PostScript, don't we? I still use Timbuktu (originally developed by WOS Datasystems/Farallon/Netopia.) for remote control. Just because it's old doesn't mean it should go away. We need to demonstrate that there is still a significant PowerPC (PPC) user base out there which uses Dropbox Desktop Client. For Dropbox to decommission Dropbox Desktop Client for Mac OS X 10.5.8 messes up my workflow and backup strategy.
I have Dropbox syncing nicely on my new Synology DS 1513+ NAS. Being backwardly compatible and cross platform should be an ideal, not a burden. A portion of a company's income should go toward supporting legacy hardware and software.
0 kommentar(er)
